El desempeño,la privaticación,los profesionales de la educación y el estado
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este artículo discute y analiza tres aspectos de la política educativa; estos aspectos son: i) el desempeño
entendido como la tecnología y la forma de regulación y reglamentación que utiliza juicios, comparaciones y demuestra como medidas de· la productividad o de resultados la valoración de individuos y de organizaciones; ii) la privatización, entendida como la utilización de distintas formas de mercado para reformar las instituciones públicas del sector educativo, (privatización endógena) o la presencia de proveedores privados que ofrecen servicios educativos (privatización exógena); iii) los cambios en las formas y modalidades en la cual el estado, se transforma de un gobierno, (burocracia y administración) a un control (ejercido por empresas y redes). En el centro de esta infraestructura de la política coloco al profesor, al maestro. - al profesional de la educación- como sujeto de la reforma educativa. Clasifico también, de forma amplia, tres distintos tipos de literatura y, lo que destaco con mayor importancia, asumo una posición personal dentro de una intersección caracterizada por incitaciones y seducciones inmersas en la reforma del sector educativo
Referencias
Ball, S. J. Education Ple: Understanding private sector
participation in public sector education, Routledge,
London. 2007a.
Ball, S. J. Privatising Education, Privatising Education
Policy, Privatising Educational Research: network
governance and the 'competition state'. The Routledge
Lecture, In British Educational Research Association
London. 2007b.
Baumann, Z. Modernity and Ambivalence, Oxford:
Polity Press. 1991.
Bernstein, B. Pedagogy Symbolic Control and Identity,
Taylor and Francis, London. 1996.
Broadhead, L.-A. and Howard, S. The Art of Punishing:
The Research Assessment Exercise and the Ritualisation
of Power in Higher Education, Education Policy Analysis
Archives, 6. 1998.
Butler, J. Undoing Gender, Routledge, New York and
London. 2 004.
Campbell, C., Evans, J., Askew, S., Hughes, M. and
McCallum, B. Evaluation of Education Partnership
Boards, Institute of Education, University of London,
London. 2 004.
Canaan, J. A Funny thing happened on the way to
the (European Social) forum: or how new forms of
accountabilit:)T are transforming academic's identities
and possible responses. 2008.
Davies, B. and Petersen, E. B. Neo-Liberal discourse
and the academ;-: the f orestalling of ( collective)
resistance, Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences,
, 77-79. 2005.
Davies, B. and Petersen, E. B. Neo-Liberal discourse and
the academy: the f orestalling of ( collective) resistance,
Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences, 2, 77-97.
Dillabough, J .A. 'Gender poli tics and conceptions of the
modern teacher: women, identity and professionalism'.
British J ournal of Sociology of Education, 2 O, 3 7 3-94.
Falk, C. 'Sente11cing learners to life'. Theory, Technology
and Culture, 22, 19-27. 1999.
Foucault, M. Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth:
Penguin. 197 9.
Foucault, M. The Subject and Power: afterword to, In
Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and
Hermeneutics (Eds, Dreyfus, H. and Rabinow, P.)
University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 1983.
Gee, J. New people in new worlds: networks, the new
capitalism and schools, In Multiliteracies: literacy
learning and the design of social futures (Eds, Cope, B.
and Kalantzis, M.) Routledge, London.1999.
Gray, A. Contract Culture and target fetishism:
the distortive effects of output measures on local
regeneration programmes, Local Economy, 11 (4), 343
- 357. 1997.
Hunter, I. Assembling the School, In Foucault and
Political Reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and
rationalities of government(Eds, Barry, A., Os borne, T.
and Rose, N.) UCL Press, London. 1996.
Jessop, B. The rise of governance and the risks of
failure'. International Social Science J ournal, 5 O
(155), 29-45. 1998.
Kickert, W J. M., Klijn, E. H. and Koppenjan, J. F.
M. Managing networks in the piblic sector: Findings
and Reflections, In Managing Complex Networks:
Strategies fo the Public Sector(Eds, Kickert, W J. M.,
Klijn, E. H. and Koppenjan, J. F. M.) Sage, Thousand
Oaks: CA. 1997.
Latour, B. Science in Action: Hov to follow scientist and
engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard:,
University Press. 1987.
Leys, M. (2001) Market-Driven Poli tics, Verso,
London.
Lyotard, J. -F. The on Knowledge,
Manchester.1984. Postmodern Condition: A Report
Manchester University Press,
MacKinnon, D. Managerialism, governmentality and
the state: a neo-Foucauldian approach to local economic
governance, Political Geography, 19, 293-314. 2000.
MacKinnon, D. Managerialism, governmentality
and the state: a neo-Foucauldian approach to local
economic governance, Political Geography, 19 ( 3),
- 314. 2000.
Mahony, P., Hextall and Menter, I. Threshold assessment
and performance management: modernizing or
masculinizing teaching in England, Gender and
Education, 16, 131-149. 2 004a.
Mahony, P., Menter, I. and Hextall The emotional
impact of performance-related pay on teachers in
England, British Educational Research Journal, 30,
-456. 2004b.
Mackenzie, R. and Lucio, M.M. 'The realities of
regulatory change: beyond the fetish of deregulation'.
British Journal of Sociology, 39, 499-314. 2005.
Marinetto, M. 'Governing beyond th~ centre: a critique
of the anglo-governance school'. Political Studies, 51,
-608. 2003.
Morley, L. Quality and Power in Higher Education,
Open University Press, Maidenhead. 2003.
Nevvman, J. Modernising Governance: New Labour,
Policy and Society, Sage, London. 2001.
Nietzsche, F. Untimely Meditations, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. 19 8 3.
O'Flynn, G. and Petersen, E. B. The 'good life' and
the 'rich portfolio': young women, schooling and neoliberal
subjectification, British J ournal of Sociology of
Education, 28,459-472. 2007.
O'Sullivan, D. Cultural Politics and Irish Education
since the 19 50s: Policy Paradigms and Power, Institute
of Public Administration, Dublin. 2005.
Patrinos, H. A. Education Contracting: Scope for Future
Research, In Mobilizing the Prívate Sector for Public
Educationco-sponsored by the World Bank, Kennedy
School of Government, Harvard University. 2005.
Perryman, J. Panoptic performativity and school
inspection regimes: disciplinary mechanisms and life
under special measures J ournal of Education Policy, 21,
-161. 2006.
Perryman, J. Inspection and Emotion, Cambridge
J ournal of Education, 3 7, 17 3-190.
Power, M. The audit explotion. London:
Demos.2007 .1994.
Richards, D. and Smith, M.J. Governance and public
policy in the United Kingdom. Oxf ord: Oxf ord
University Press. 2002.
Rose, N. Governing ''advanced'' liberal democracies,
In Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, neoliberalism
and rationalities of government(Eds, Barry,
A., Osborne, T. and Rose, N.) UCL Press, London.
Saltman, K. J. Collateral Damage: Corporatizing public
schools - A threat to democracy, Rowan and Littlefield,
Lanham: Maryland. 2002.
Saltman, K. J. The Edison Schools: Corporate Schooling
and the Assault on Public Education, Routledge, New
ork. 2005.
Shore, C. and Wright, S. Audit Culture andAnthropology:
neo-liberalism in British Higher Education, El
desempeño, la privatización, los profesionales de
la educación y el estado. The Journal of the Royal
Anthropological Institute, 5, 5 57-57 5. 1999.
Slater, D. and Tonkiss, F. Market Society, Polity Press,
Cambridge.2001.
Sparkes, A. C. Embodiment, academics and the audit
culture: Astory seeking consideration, Qualitative
Research, 7. 2 007.
Strathern, M. 'Improving ratings: audit in the British
university system'. European Review, 5, 305 - 21.
ViTincent-J ones, P. The newpublic contracting: regulation,
responsiveness, relationality. Oxf ord: Oxf ord University
Press. 2006.
Yeatman, A. The New Contractualism: Management
Reform or a New Approach to Governance?, In New
Ideas, Better Government(Eds, Davis, G. and Weller,
P.) Allen and Unwin, St Leonards, Australia. 1996.
Zambeta, E. Modernisation of Educational Governance
in Greece: from state control to state steering, European
Educational Research Journal, 1, 637-655. 2002.
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
A partir de la edición No. 46 del año 2024 hacia adelante, se cambia la Licencia Creative Commons “Atribución—No Comercial – Sin Obra Derivada” a la siguiente:
Atribución - No Comercial – Compartir igual: esta licencia permite a otros distribuir, remezclar, retocar, y crear a partir de tu obra de modo no comercial, siempre y cuando te den crédito y licencien sus nuevas creaciones bajo las mismas condiciones.
